Kevin Sanjaya Racket and Gear Setup

Last checked: August 2026 · Written by the player-led team at Badminton House

Kevin Sanjaya’s racket story is useful when it stays evidence-first. The public record gives a clear model-level trail at a few dated events. It does not give a complete personal setup sheet. That distinction matters if you admire fast doubles and want a sensible starting point for your own kit.

---

What is verified in Kevin Sanjaya’s racket timeline?

Yonex’s 2018 All England report lists Kevin S. Sukamuljo with ASTROX 88 S and BG80. Read this as a dated equipment listing: it establishes the named racket and string at that event, not an uninterrupted career timeline or a full personal setup.

See Yonex’s 2018 All England equipment report for the listing. The currently checked primary sources do not verify the reported Victor Hypernano X900, Jetspeed S12, Arcsaber 11, or later ASTROX stages. A short, well-sourced record is more useful than a complete-looking timeline built from guesses.

---

What do the ASTROX 88 S PRO specs actually say?

The current ASTROX 88 S PRO page specifies a stiff racket offered in 4U (average 83 g) and 3U (average 88 g). Those are product variants and manufacturer descriptors, so they help a reader compare options without claiming that Kevin used either exact weight or an individually measured balance point.

Yonex lists 20–28 lb stringing advice for the 4U version and 21–29 lb for the 3U version. Treat the ranges as the maker’s advice for the model, not proof of a particular player’s tension, results, or role. Yonex’s ASTROX 88 S PRO specifications

---

Make the comparison on your own court

A label is most helpful when it leads to a small on-court comparison. Take the same partner, shuttle type, and warm-up routine where possible. Start with the shots that decide your usual doubles rallies: a defensive block, a flat drive, a lift under pressure, a rear-court clear, and a controlled net reply. The goal is not to crown a winner after five minutes. It is to notice whether one option repeatedly asks for an adjustment you do not enjoy making.

Write down short observations rather than broad verdicts. “Late on my backhand drive after a long rally” is more useful than “too slow.” “Net reply sits high when I am rushed” is more useful than “no control.” Those notes let you return to the same comparison later, and they keep the decision tied to an actual shot rather than the status of a player or model.

---

What should a club player copy, and what should stay personal?

Copy the research habit, not an imagined professional specification: use dated manufacturer records for the model, then make your weight, grip, and tension decision separately. The checked sources give no personal tension for Kevin, so a club player has no evidence-based reason to reproduce a reported high-20s or 30 lb number.

• Copy: the discipline of separating a documented racket model from a full personal setup.
• Test: whether 3U or 4U and stiff flex suit your own sessions and shots.
• Keep personal: string tension, grip build-up, and any adjustment made with a qualified stringer or after on-court testing.

A useful first session with any new racket is simple: use your usual string and familiar tension, play normal clears, drives, blocks, and net shots, then note what feels late, tiring, or unstable. Change one variable at a time. That process gives you a repeatable comparison without borrowing settings that have not been publicly documented.

The BG80 entry in the 2018 report deserves the same care. It tells us which string Yonex listed alongside the racket at that event. It does not tell us the tension, the stringer’s process, the condition of the strings, or whether a club player will prefer it.

This is especially important when a gear list turns into an instruction online. A reported tension can sound precise, yet precision is not evidence when the source never published it. Keep an unknown value unknown. Your stringer can work from the racket’s stated advice, your current setup, and the feedback you bring from play; that is a stronger basis for change than trying to recreate an undocumented professional number.

There is no need to force a permanent court-role identity onto your racket choice. Many club doubles players rotate, defend, and attack from different areas during the same game. Keep the option that helps you play your ordinary patterns with confidence. The final decision belongs to your game, not to a retrospective reading of a pro’s bag.

If the comparison remains unclear, pause before changing several things at once. A second session with the same setup often gives a cleaner answer than a rush of new strings, grips, and weight assumptions.

Turn the trial into a usable choice

Before you play, write one question for the session. It might be whether you can keep a drive compact late in a rally, whether your defensive block reaches a useful height, or whether a familiar net reply needs extra effort. Make the question specific enough that you could answer it from a few ordinary rallies. A broad question such as “Is this better?” encourages a verdict before you have noticed what changed.

Keep the comparison fair. Use the same type of shuttle, the same partner when practical, and a familiar warm-up. Do not change strings, grip thickness, and racket at once. If one racket is new to your hand, give yourself time to settle before judging it. The aim is not to prove that a model has a universal personality. It is to learn whether its feel helps you make your regular shots with less adjustment.

After the session, separate a pattern from a single miss. If a block sits high once, note the context. If it repeatedly sits high when the pace rises, you have a question worth retesting. The same applies to fatigue: identify the shot, the stage of the rally, and the response you had to make. A short note preserves more useful information than a score out of ten because it gives you something clear to compare next time.

Use the evidence in this article as a boundary, too. The 2018 listing can tell you what Yonex reported for that event. The current product page can tell you what it publishes for the available 88 S PRO variants. Neither source can select a tension, grip, or weight for you. Let your own repeated sessions make that final part of the decision.